Imagine a platform for compliance is $12,000 a year. How much is it?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If $12,000 can be used to eliminate hundreds of hours collecting evidence in a complex technological environment this could be money worth investing. If a company of seven could gather the same proof in the space of a few hours every month, the cost differs.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Start by asking which platform has the greatest features. Ask your company how these features can help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing Has an End-of-Even
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance changes as the company grows. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments as well as many applications. The burden of manually collecting evidence on a regular basis could be very high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify the cost.
Now consider a 10-person startup making preparations for its first SOC 2. The infrastructure could be compact, and evidence collection is still manageable even without massive automation.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. While an advanced platform could offer many capabilities, they are only valuable for organizations that are required by the company.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta or Drata can quickly become an exercise in feature-by-feature. Both platforms are built on automation and integrated, so organizations looking for this type of approach will benefit from looking at the frameworks they support, their integrations and service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s yet another one you’ll need to make. Do you want to use an integration-driven compliance platform at all? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Use the same model
Many Vanta competitors are also in a similar category that emphasizes automation. There are also platforms that are less heavy that concentrate on organization over extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. CertAssist is a product developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors, and other professionals, organizes the controls frameworks into a single workspace. It allows for the editing of policies and guidelines for the auditing process, and allows auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It does not set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers can upload their own evidence.
Consideration should be given to the access to the system.
It is evident that the removal of integrations will have a disadvantage. One must gather evidence by hand.
The application for compliance doesn’t need integration or integration and may be used without any connection to the operating environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. It is important to ask which tradeoffs make sense for your particular business.
CertAssist targets teams that have between five and 200 members. Its pricing is published rather than requiring a sales call to get the first figure. The stated launch price for CertAssist is $225 monthly rather than the usual $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The needs of a 10-person company today may not be its needs at 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple, a lightweight platform may make sense. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor greater automation. It’s better to let the complexity of compliance technology earn its place.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations because they seem impressive in the comparison chart. Pay for them only if the manual work they replace becomes the most expensive option.